Go to » Web - QA - Dictionary - Encyclopedia - Images
 Web Opens New Window. Results 1 - 10 of about 17,700,000 for Verification Validation 

Verification and Validation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  
Verification & Validation is the process of checking that ... Maturity of verification and validation in ICT companies. Sustainability testing. System testing ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verification_and_Validation

Verification and Validation (software) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  
By themselves, verification and validation do not guarantee software quality; ... Verification and validation often is carried out by a separate group from the ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verification_and_Validation_(software)

Paper for Topic: Verification/Validation/Certification

  
Verification, validation, and certification are essential in the life cycle of ... Because of this change, verification and validation has similarly also undergone ...
http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/des_s99/verification/index.html

FDS-SMV Official Website | Verification & Validation

  
The terms Verification and Validation are often used interchangeably to mean the ... The entire set of Verification and Validation files are available in the ...
http://fire.nist.gov/fds/verification_validation.html

Hypersizer | Structural Sizing Software

  
... analysis software providing stress analysis and preliminary structural design for weight reduction, ... Verification and Validation documents>> (customer login) ...
http://www.hypersizer.com/verification-validation.html

Embedded.com - Verification and Validation

  
This is the place to come for tutorials, code, demos, and news, along with ... Verification and validation techniques can be applied throughout the product ...
http://www.embedded.com/story/OEG20010529S0112

Model Verification and Validation

  
Model verification and validation (V&V) are. essential parts of the model development ... Guide for the Verification and Validation of Computational Fluid ...
http://jtac.uchicago.edu/conferences/05/resources/V&V_macal_pres.pdf

Verification and Validation

  
Verification and validation should establish. confidence that the software is fit for purpose ... Verification and validation is concerned with ...
http://www.cse.unr.edu/~sushil/class/425/notes/ch19.pdf

Software Independent Verification & Validation Facility

  
The NASA IV
http://www.ivv.nasa.gov/

Blue Star Infotech

  
Verification and Validation. Specialized Testing. Process Improvement ... Blue Star Infotech's Verification and Validation Services ensure that you ...
http://www.bsil.com/verificationvalidation.html
 MORE WEB RESULTS »  

 Questions 'n' Answers about 'Verification and Validation' Opens New Window.

Q.How to understand the two words,validation and verification?Related Search:
Programming & Design
 I was once asked the difference between validation and verification.I looked up them in net,but i still don't know the difference.Anyone could tell me more specific,examples are better.Thanks
A.VALIDATE -that's declaring something legal or valid for example: You purchased a software. After installing it, the software will ask you to validate your copy. This would require you, perhaps, to fill out some forms, enter a product key, or connecting to the internet. The purpose of this is to determine whether or not you have purchased a pirated copy of the software. if your software is not validated (not made legal), the owner/publisher of the software has the right to disable certain features of the software, limit your use of the software, or even block you to use the software. VERIFY -decalre something to be true While verify may seem a little similar to validate, the word "validate" actually is often used in terms of "legality" like validating tickets, passports, papers, etc. On the other hand, the word "verify" is similar to "confirmation" though it is not directly related to "legalities". For example -- verifying your age (this means you have to agree or confirm that you are of that certain age), verify you personal data To make it more clear, I'll be using here the two words: 1. verify your age You might get into a site wherein it will ask you to verify your age whether or not you are eighteen and above. You may click "yes" even though you are not. That means "verifying" could mean more like self-affirmation. 2. validate your age This is where legalities come. For instance, you are going to apply for a job that requires you to be at least 18 years of age. You cannot just say, "Yes, I'm eighteen". You have to prove it. You might be required to submit your legal birth certificate, your ID, etc. In simpler terms.... Verify is but to confirm Validate is to prove your confirmation
  

Q.If I ask for verification or debt validation while in court proceedings, does it cost me anything to do so?Related Search:
Law & Ethics
 I get your first answer What I meant to ask was "Is there a charge to ask or demand that a verification or validation of said debt"be produced by the creditor.
A.No, I wouldn't think so -- it'd be similar to discovery in a criminal trial -- if you ask for it, the opposing party would be obligated to provide it to you -- they can't charge you for it.
  

Q.What is the difference between "verification" and "validation"?Related Search:
Words & Wordplay
 English is my second language. My feeling is that you have more confidence in things that you want verify than those you want to validate. Is that right?
A.I think if you verify something, you are already convinced it is true or correct - you are just verifying once more. Whereas for a validation the validity is not yet established, so it could turn out either way.
  

Q.what is verification and validation of IT systems in Health care organisation?Related Search:
Corporations
 This is a critical business process that the organisation dealing with health care products needs to have. This validates the entire software development lifecycle process. I understand that a few companies like Teratec in US provide these services. I want to know what these services are and what is required to be done.
A.You need to get a detailed program
  

Q.can anyone tell what is the differance between verification and validation?Related Search:
Other - Education
 And also tell me why validation is a difficult process??
A.Verification is more towards something that is "accepted" and you attempt to check its authenticity. while validation has the more technical meaning, check before anything is done.
  

Q.software testing - example of verification and validation?Related Search:
Standards & Testing
 I have asked this question earlier also but never got a good response. please guide if anyone knows some good examples of verification and validation w.r.t software testing.
A.[Link] 
  

Q.whats the difference between data verification and data validation?Related Search:
Programming & Design
 please put it in simple wording so i can understand!
A.Verification means checking to see if there is data. Validation means making sure that data is correct. Hope this helps! Peace to you and yours, Matthew "Dra'Gon" Stohler
  
 Dictionary Opens New Window.

Click on the word below to see the definition:
 
 Encyclopedia Opens New Window.

Verification & Validation is the process of checking that a product, service, or system meets specifications and that it fulfils its intended purpose. These are critical components of a quality management system such as ISO 9000.

Contents

[edit] Terminology

Verification is a quality process that is used to evaluate whether or not a product, service, or system complies with a regulation, specification, or conditions imposed at the start of a development phase. Verification can be in development, scale-up, or production. This is often an internal process.

Validation is the process of establishing documented evidence that provides a high degree of assurance that a product, service, or system accomplishes its intended requirements. This often involves acceptance and suitability with external customers.

It is sometimes said that validation can be expressed by the query ‘Are you building the right thing?’ and verification by ‘Are you building the thing right?’. 'Building the right thing' refers back to the user's needs, while 'building it right' checks that the documented development process was followed. In some contexts, it is required to have written requirements for both as well as formal procedures or protocols for determining compliance.

[edit] Activities

Verification of machinery and equipment usually consists of Design Qualification - DQ [1], Installation Qualification - IQ [2], Operational Qualification - OQ [3] and Performance Qualification - PQ [4]. DQ is usually a vendor's job. However, DQ can also be performed by the user, by confirming through review and testing that the equipment meets the written acquisition specification. If the relevant document or manuals of machinery/equipment are provided by vendors, the later 3Q needs to be thoroughly performed by the users who work in an industrial regulatory environment. Otherwise, the process of IQ, OQ and PQ is the task of validation. The typical example of such a case could be the loss or absence of vendor's documentation for legacy equipment or DIY assemblies (i.e. cars, computers etc.) and, therefore, users should endeavour to acquire DQ document beforehand. Each template of DQ, IQ, OQ and PQ usually can be found on the internet respectively, whereas the DIY qualifications of machinery/equipment can be assisted either by the vendor's training course materials and tutorials, or by the published guidance books, such as step-by-step series if the acquisition of machinery/equipment is not bundled with on- site qualification services. This kind of the DIY approach is also applicable to the qualifications of software, computer operating systems and a manufacturing process. The most important and critical task as the last step of the activity is to generating and archiving machinery/equipment qualification reports for auditing purposes, if regulatory compliances are mandatory. At the same time, one should bear in mind to kindly share the original work with others, if the activity, especially validation of newly invented machinery/equipment, is worth of publishing.

Qualification of machinery/equipment is venue dependent and re-qualification needs to be conducted once the objects are relocated. The full scales of some equipment qualifications are even time dependent, and hence re-certification is necessary when a specified due time laps [5], [6]. Re-qualification of machinery/equipment should also be conducted when replacement of parts, or coupling with another device, or installing a new application software and restructuring of the computer which affects especially the pre-settings, such as on BIOS, registry, disk drive partition table, or an ini file etc, have been necessary. In such a situation, the specifications of the parts/devices/software and restructuring proposals should be appended to the qualification document whether the parts/devices/software are genuine or not. Torres and Hyman have discussed the suitability of non genuine parts for clinical use and provided guidelines for equipment users to select appropriate substitutes which are capable to avoid adverse effects [7]. In the case when genuine parts/devices/software are demanded by some of regulatory requirements, then re-qualification should not be conducted on the non genuine assemblies. In stead, the asset has to be recycled for non regulatory purposes.

When machinery/equipment qualification is conducted by a standard endorsed third party such as by an ISO standard accredited company for a particular division, the process is called certification [8], [9]. Currently, the coverage of ISO/IEC 15408 certification by an ISO/IEC 27001 accredited organization is limited, the scheme requires a fair amount of efforts to get popularized.

[edit] Categories & aspects of validation

Validation work can generally be catogrized by the following functions:

  • Prospective validation - the missions conducted before new items are released to make sure the characteristics of the interests which are functional properly and which meet the safety standards [10], [11]. Some examples could be legislative rules, guidelines or proposals [12], [13], [14], methods [15], theories/hypothesis/models [16], [17], products and services [18], [19]
  • Retrospective validation - a process for items that are already in use and distribution or production. The validation is performed against the written specifications or predetermined expectations, based upon their historical data/evidences that are documented/recorded. If any critical data is missing, then the work can not be processed or can only be completed partially [10], [20], [21]. The tasks are considered necessary [22] if
    • prospective validation is missing, inadequate or flawed.
    • the change of legislative regulations or standards affects the compliance of the items being released to the public or market.
    • reviving of out-of-use items

Some of the examples could be validating of the ancient scriptures that contain controversies [23], [24], clinical decision rules [25], data systems [26], [27] etc.

  • Full scale validation
  • Partial validation - often used for research and pilot studies if time is constrained. The most important and significant effects are tested. From an analytical chemistry perspective, those effects are selectivity, accuracy, repeatability, linearity and its range.
  • Re-validation/Locational or Periodical validation - carried out, for the item of interest that is dismissed, repaired, integrated/coupled, relocated, or after a specified time laps. Examples of this category could be relicencing/renewing driver's license, recertifying an analytical balance that has been expired or relocated, and even revalidating professionals [28], [29].
  • Concurrent validation - conducted during a routine processing of services, manufacturing or engineering etc. Example of these could be duplicated sample analysis, single sample analysis with multiplicated online system suitability testings

The most tested attributes in the validation taskes may include

  • Selectivity/specificity
  • Accuracy
  • Precision/Repeatability
  • Reproducibility
  • Curve fitting
  • System suitability - In a broad way, it usually includes a test of ruggedness among inter-colaborators or a test of robustness within an organization [30], [31], [32]. However, FDA has specifically defined it for its administration, as "System suitability testing is an integral part of many analytical procedures. The tests are based on the concept that the equipment, electronics, analytical operations and samples to be analyzed constitute an integral system that can be evaluated as such. System suitability test parameters to be established for a particular procedure depend on the type of procedure being validated." A good example is provided by the company of GMP ONLINE CONSULTANCY and the test requires certified standards if a compendial method is to be used [33].

[edit] Industry references

These terms generally apply broadly across industries and institutions. In addition, they may have very specific meanings and requirements for specific products, regulations, and industries. Some examples:

  • Food and Drug
    • Pharmaceuticals The design, production, and distribution of drugs are highly regulated. This includes software systems. For example in the USA, the Food and Drug Administration have regulations in Part 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations [1]. Nash et al. have published a book which provides a comprehensive coverage on the various validation topics of pharmaceutical manufacturing processes [34]. Some companies are taking a risk-based approach to validating their GAMP system if one understands the regulatory requirements very well while the most of others follows the conventional process [35], [36]. It is a part of GxP management.
    • Medical devices The FDA (21 CFR) has validation and verification requirements for medical devices. . See guidance: [2] and ISO 13485
    • Manufacturing process and cleaning validation are compulsory and regulated by FDA [10], [37], [38], [39].
    • Food hygiene: example [3]
    • Clinical laboratory medicine: ISO 15198:2004 Clinical laboratory medicine -- In vitro diagnostic medical devices -- Validation of user quality control procedures by the manufacturer

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ Validation Online. "DESIGN QUALIFICATION". Retrieved on 17 March, 2008.
  2. ^ Validation Online. "INSTALLATION QUALIFICATION". Retrieved on 17 March, 2008.
  3. ^ Validation Online. "OPERATIONAL QUALIFICATION". Retrieved on 17 March, 2008.
  4. ^ Validation Online. "PERFORMANCE QUALIFICATION". Retrieved on 17 March, 2008.
  5. ^ Analytical & Precision Balance Co.. "Welcome". Retrieved on 18 March, 2008.
  6. ^ Scientech. "External Calibration". Retrieved on 18 March, 2008.
  7. ^ Torres, Rebecca E.; William A. Hyman (2007). "Replacement Parts-Identical, Suitable, or Inappropriate?". Retrieved on 29 March, 2008.
  8. ^ AppLabs. "ISV, IHV Certification Programs". Retrieved on 26 March, 2008.
  9. ^ AppLabs. "AppLabs attains ISO27001:2005 accreditation". Retrieved on 26 March, 2008.
  10. ^ a b c U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "GUIDELINE ON GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF PROCESS VALIDATION". Retrieved on 24 September, 2008.
  11. ^ Groupe Novasep. "Prospective validation". Retrieved on 24 September, 2008.
  12. ^ Quinn, James et al. (2006). "Prospective Validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to Predict Patients With Serious Outcomes". Annals of Emergency Medicine (Elsevier) 47 (5): 448–454. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.11.019. 
  13. ^ Sangiovanni, A. et al. (2007). "Prospective validation of AASLD guidelines for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients". Digestive and Liver Disease (Elsevier) 40 (5): A22–A23. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2007.12.064. 
  14. ^ Germing, U. et al. (2006). "Prospective validation of the WHO proposals for the classification of myelodysplastic syndromes". Haematologica 91 (12): 1596–1604. PMID 17145595. http://haematologica.org/cgi/content/abstract/91/12/1596. Retrieved on 24 September. 
  15. ^ Sciolla, Rossella et al. (2008). "Rapid Identification of High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attacks: Prospective Validation of the ABCD Score". Stroke (American Heart Association) 39 (2): 297–302. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.496612. PMID 18174479. 
  16. ^ Pfisterer, Matthias et al. (2008). "Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents forlarge coronary vessel stenting? The BASKET-PROVE (PROspective Validation Examination) trial: Study protocol and design". American Heart Journal (Mosby-Year Book Inc) 115 (4): 609–614. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.011. http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/amhj/abstract.00000406-200804000-00005.htm;jsessionid=LZBJTyL1zvPbLLyTqcYVCLhhfJ3KWKKXjvkTn91r3c1vJYyDhpWR!1455807198!181195628!8091!-1. Retrieved on 24 September. 
  17. ^ Van Geest-Daalderop, Johanna H. H. et al. (2008). "Improvement in the regulation of the vitamin K antagonist acenocoumarol after a standard initial dose regimen: prospective validation of a prescription model". Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis (Springer). doi:10.1007/s11239-008-0203-4. 
  18. ^ Ames, D. et al. (1996). "Prospective validation of the EBAS-DEP -- A short sensitive screening instrument for depression in the physically ill elderly". European Psychiatry (Elsevier) 11 (Supplement 4,): 361s. doi:10.1016/0924-9338(96)89148-6. 
  19. ^ Kidwell, Chelsea S. et al. (2000). "Identifying Stroke in the Field: Prospective Validation of the Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen (LAPSS)". Stroke (American Heart Association) 31: 71–76. PMID 10625718. http://stroke.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/strokeaha;31/1/71. Retrieved on 24 September. 
  20. ^ U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "Ch. 4 PROCESS VALIDATION in Medical Device Quality Systems Manual". Retrieved on 24 September, 2008.
  21. ^ Groupe Novasep. "Retrospective validation". Retrieved on 24 September, 2008.
  22. ^ Validation-online.net. "Retrospective validation Rationale". Retrieved on 24 September, 2008.
  23. ^ Vieth, Erich. "Who changed the Bible and why? Bart Ehrman’s startling answers". Retrieved on 26 September, 2008.
  24. ^ Arlandson, James M.. "Domestic violence in Islam". Retrieved on 17 October, 2008.
  25. ^ Hart, D.; S.W. Smith (2007). "Retrospective Validation of a Clinical Decision Rule to Safely Rule Out Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Emergency Department Headache Patients". Annals of Emergency Medicine 50 (3): S102–S103. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.06.388. 
  26. ^ Kluger, Michael D. et al.. "Retrospective Validation of a Surveillance System for Unexplained Illness and Death: New Haven County, Connecticut". Retrieved on 26 September, 2008.
  27. ^ Fine, Leon G. et al.. "How to evaluate and improve the quality and credibility of an outcomes database: validation and feedback study on the UK Cardiac Surgery Experience". Retrieved on 26 September, 2008.
  28. ^ Department of Health (United Kingdom). "The White Paper Trust, assurance and safety: The regulation of health professionals". Retrieved on 30 September, 2008.
  29. ^ Merkur, Sherry. "Physician revalidation in Europe". Royal College of Physicians. Retrieved on 30 September, 2008.
  30. ^ Health Sciences Authority. "Guidance Notes on Analytical Method Validation: Methodology" (PDF). Retrieved on 29 September, 2008.
  31. ^ Heyden, Y. Vander et al.; S.W. Smith (2001). "Guidance for robustness/ruggedness tests in method validation". Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (Elsevier) 24 (5 - 6): 723–753. doi:10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00529-X. 
  32. ^ Ermer, Joachim; John H. McB. Miller (2005). Method Validation in Pharmaceutical Analysis: A Guide to best Practice. Wiley-VCH. pp. 418. ISBN 3527312552. 
  33. ^ GMP ONLINE CONSULTANCY. "Calibration of dissolution test apparatus (USP apparatus 1 and 2) - SOP". Retrieved on 29 September, 2008.
  34. ^ Nash, Robert A. et al. (2003). Pharmaceutical Process Validation: An International Third Edition. Informa Healthcare. pp. 860. ISBN 0824708385. 
  35. ^ De Caris, Sandro et al.. "Risk-based equipment qualification: a user/supplier cooperative approach" (PDF). Retrieved on 15 June, 2008.
  36. ^ Ocampo, Arlene et al. (2007). "Current challenges for FDA-regulated bioanalytical laboratories for human (BA/BE) studies. Part I: defining the appropriate compliance standards - application of the principles of FDA GLP and FDA GMP to bioanalytical laboratories". The Quality Assurance Journal (John Wiley & Sons) 11 (1): 3–15. doi:10.1002/qaj.399. 
  37. ^ Food and Drug Administration. "GUIDE TO INSPECTIONS VALIDATION OF CLEANING PROCESSES". Retrieved on 20 March, 2008.
  38. ^ Nassani, Mowafak. "Cleaning validation in the pharmaceutical industry". Retrieved on 20 March, 2008.
  39. ^ Bharadia, Praful D.; Jignyasha A. Bhatt. "A review of current implementation strategies for validation of cleaning processes in the pharmaceutical industry". Retrieved on 20 March, 2008.
  40. ^ Masako, Tsujimoto. "Verification of genetic recombination by hypha fusion of Pyricularia oryzas using transducing gene as marker. ( the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Natl. Agricultural Res. Center S ).". Retrieved on 20 March, 2008.
  41. ^ Vollmer-Sanders, Carrie Lynn et al.. "Implications of the Voluntary Michigan Agriculture Environmental Assurance Program (MAEAP) Verification on Livestock Operations, 2000-2004". Retrieved on 20 March, 2008.
  42. ^ Haboudane, Driss et al. (2004). "Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: Modeling and validation in the context of precision agriculture". Accreditation and Quality Assurance: Journal for Quality, Comparability and Reliability in Chemical Measurement (Elsevier) 90 (3): 337–352. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.013. 
  43. ^ Thorp, Kelly et al.. "USING CROSS-VALIDATION TO EVALUATE CERES-MAIZE YIELD SIMULATIONS WITHIN A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR PRECISION AGRICULTURE". Retrieved on 20 March, 2008.
  44. ^ Randolph, Susan et al.. "Monitoring the Realization of the Right to Food: Adaptation and Validation of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Insecurity Module to Rural Senegal". Retrieved on 20 March, 2008.
  45. ^ Pruitt, Kirk; Ryan Paul Chamberlain. "Method and system for authenticating appraisal reports". Retrieved on 15 September, 2008.


All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details.)
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Privacy policy - About Wikipedia - Disclaimers - Fundraising
 
 Images Opens New Window.
File Size: 6.2998046875k
Dimensions: 254 x 168 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 15.599609375k
Dimensions: 90 x 558 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 6.8994140625k
Dimensions: 152 x 394 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 6.099609375k
Dimensions: 136 x 175 pixels
File Format: gif
File Size: 27.599609375k
Dimensions: 75 x 75 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 11.19921875k
Dimensions: 202 x 350 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 12.599609375k
Dimensions: 235 x 230 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 3.5k
Dimensions: 140 x 87 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 13.2998046875k
Dimensions: 190 x 185 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 13.2998046875k
Dimensions: 211 x 185 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 32.3994140625k
Dimensions: 166 x 186 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 32k
Dimensions: 298 x 358 pixels
File Format: jpeg
 
 MORE IMAGES »  
Go to » Web - QA - Dictionary - Encyclopedia - Images