Go to » Web - QA - Dictionary - Encyclopedia - Images
 Web Opens New Window. Results 0 - 0 of about 0 for Caravan of Death 
Sorry for the inconvenience! Unable to fulfill the request. Try the suggestions below or type a new query above.
 

 Questions 'n' Answers about 'Caravan of Death' Opens New Window.

Q.Why does Islam choose death over life? Osama Bin Laden is calling for a caravan of martyrs.?Related Search:
Religion & Spirituality
 God is life, not death. What kind of god do you Muslims serve?
A.They serve the god of this world (Satan) since John 10 tells us that the thief comes not but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy, (all three of these things are marks of Islam), but Jesus came that we might have life and have it more abundantly. If something or someone is about death they are of Satan.
  

Q.Why do some Chileans still support the legacy of dictator General Augusto Pinochet?Related Search:
Chile
 I was watching this documentary in one of my classes, which was called "The Judge and the General". It showed how Pinochet committed so many crimes against people during his military dictatorship, and how he finally got extradited and was indicted on these crimes. One part that really struck out to me was how many people mourned his death, and when his supporters came out. I can understand that in 1973, those who were afraid that Chile'd go Communist would support Pinochet. But now, everyone knows about Operation Condor, embezzlement of state funds in foreign banks, the Caravan of Death, and the DINA secret police. So after all of that, how can he still have such a loyal following?
A.A good first-hand read of those days is by Marc Cooper, "Pinochet and Me". I own the book and read it at least once a year. In both Chile and Argentina, there is always an undercurrent of fascism among certain people who feel fascism is the best form of government. There are still Argentines who mourn the collapse of the equally brutal military government of the 70s and 80s, which committed horrid acts. Most notably, if a pregnant woman was arrested, the keepers would wait until the woman gave birth, then immediately execute her and give the baby to a childless couple connected to the government. However, each country had a different situation. Argentina was spiraling into lawlessness under Peron's widow. The Montenero guerrillas were gaining ground. In Chile, Salvador Allende was the legally elected president as was all of the government. It was Nixon and Kissinger who pushed for the coup. Otherwise, Chile would have had a leftist government that probably would have been voted out after one term. A top general who supported the constitution but voted against Allende was murdered for not ousting Allende ahead of him taking office, so here came Pinochet.
  

Q.Chrysler is expected to announce the death of the following models next week. Do you care?Related Search:
Chrysler
 Chrysler PT Cruiser Chrysler Sebring Dodge Avenger Dodge Caliber Dodge Grand Caravan Dodge Nitro Jeep Commander Jeep Compass Jeep Patriot
A.The first answer is hilarious! I needed that laugh. I care to the extent that people may lose their livelihood as a result. If the company becomes healthy, they can always bring these vehicles back. Chevy stopped making the Camaro for a few, now its back on the block. It is just a sign of the times. Best.
  

Q.If you live in a caravan & travel around what are the negatives (please see aditional details B4 answering)?Related Search:
Other - Destinations
 If community charges rise to 0.78% of property value I intend selling up & living in a touring caravan so as not to have to pay the tax. I will earn £12000 interest on the money and will work on a casual basis so money is not an issue. I ask the question with regard to things like where do I register my car and my driving licence as I will not have a fixed address. Would it be a problem for bank accounts? What if one of us needed hospital treatment? Any opinions on this would be appreciated as my wife and I are serious about this. We have both worked long and hard to be where we are and are sick of being taxed to death however we do want to go into this well informed. Thanks in advance to all that help - serious answers only please. If community charges rise to 0.78% of property value I intend selling up & living in a touring caravan mostly on official sites. The money we save in utility bills - including the council tax - will almost pay for the sites. I will earn £12000 interest on the money and will work on a casual basis so money is not an issue. I ask the question with regard to things like where do I register my car and my driving licence as I will not have a fixed address. Would it be a problem for bank accounts? What if one of us needed hospital treatment? Any opinions on this would be appreciated as my wife and I are serious about this. We have both worked long and hard to be where we are and are sick of being taxed to death however we do want to go into this well informed. Thanks in advance to all that help - serious answers only please.
A.the best thing to do is speak to someone from the council as they are better informed,if thats no good try speaking to travellers ie the ones from fairs as they're pretty easy going and wont mind helping as long as they know your serious
  

Q.Who is responsible for his death? Honest answers only please!?Related Search:
Philosophy
 The following is a true story, the names have been changed but the events actually happened. The question here is who holds responsibility for the death of John? Please note that any answer saying that John was fully responsible will NOT be considered. Many years ago an eleven year old boy was travelling with his mother on a road trip around the country. At length they came to caravan park in a small town where sugar cane grew. The boy, Bret, was a trusting sort but also was not one to rush head long into unfamiliar situations and his mother, Emma, was a cautious sort who had been hurt by an ugly divorce and having to raise her son alone. They had depended on each other over the long trip and trusted each others judgement of the situations that were presented to them. One day, a man from a caravan a few spots down struck up a conversation with Emma. He introduced himself as John and said that he was one of the few permanent residents of the park. Bret and she had organised a game on the ping-pong tables that were always in demand so the conversation could not last long. Two days later John approached Emma again and invited Emma and Bret over for dinner in his caravan saying that he had bought enough food for all three and that he would make fabulous dinner for the three of them. Emma however was cautious as always and said that she would have to talk to Bret. Walking back to their small car she talked to Bret and said that she didn't trust the situation, not that he seemed to be dangerous or anything just that a story from the news from two weeks before had been playing on her mind and they decided that they would say that they had planned to go to the cinemas instead. Emma told John of their contrived plan to go to the cinemas and he said that ‘maybe another night’, but he did not look like he meant it. That night they went to the cinema but they did not enjoy the show. They were a good family and did not enjoy lying even if it was to get out of a situation were they felt uncomfortable. At length they decided that they would go over to his caravan in the morning and invite him out to a fancy restaurant in town by way of an apology, not that they could spare the money. The next day Emma and Bret went and knocked on his caravan, but there was no answer. As Emma was about to knock again a voice from behind them made them jump, it was the wife of the owner of the park telling them that he was not there. Emma asked if she could leave a message for John but the wife refused. Then Emma asked why, a question that brought tears the wife’s eyes. She explained that after Emma and Bret had said no to dinner John had locked himself in his caravan until after dark. When he did finally emerge he was holding a small blanket. Walking into the sugar cane field that surrounded the park he spread out the blanket and laid down, took his service revolver and put it in his mouth and ate a bullet. It was she who had discovered his body after going to investigate the noise of the gun shot as her husband was away at the time. Emma and Bret were struck dumb as ice water ran in their veins at the realisation that they had been the last people to see him alive. The owners wife went on to explain how John’s wife had left him years before, lying about him abusing her and their children to gain sole custody over them, a move aimed solely at hurting him. The claims had been thoroughly investigated by the police and each one was proven false. But the stress of the divorce and the investigation had turned him to drink so when his day in court finally came he was ruled an unfit parent and once again denied custody and visitation rights. This spiralled had him into a deep depression. The only thing that brought any light to his life was his small dog who had died only two weeks before after being hit by a car. Bret and Emma realised that John was not only being nice by asking them over for tea he was asking for help, for someone to talk to, for someone who provide a shoulder to cry on. They realised that he had not meant them any harm and if they had accepted he would be alive that day. To this day neither Emma nor Bret can forgive themselves for what happened that night, nor will they ever turn down a plea for help again, no matter where it comes from. Who is responsible for John’s death? Bret and Emma, John’s wife and kids, the other people in the caravan park, all of them, none of them? Serious answers only please! Thanks. I find it facinating that Elenchuskb and Sponge B want nothing more than to lay blame at the feet of the one person who I said could not be blamed. There was a very good reson for that, suicide is so often blamed on the one who dies becuase it is easy and requires no thought what so ever. It does not matter what pain and suffering the victim goes through so long as he does not kill himself to try and escape it. Most of the time those who are quickest to condem are the slowest to act to prevent suicide, this I can say from hard won personal experience. Is it not possible that the people of the caravan park hold resposibility? They knew him and his situation yet did not engage him socially. Is it not possible that his ex-wife holds responsibility? She through her selfish actions caused the first dominop to fall. The truth should be self evident to anyone who looks hard enough, we are all guilty is someone takes their own life, we are guilty of letting it get that far! We may not have... pulled the trigger but we also did not take the gun away in the first place! This is why I said that John could not be fully at fault, I am asking if he cannot be held accountable who can? Please adjust your answers to meet the basic criteria of the question for them to be considered.
A.Seriously. I don't think anyone is at fault. Both Emma and her son had been hurt by a divorce. Being as Bret's feelings toward people are a direct response to his mothers feelings toward the divorce and what she had been through. John Went through a similar situation. He was emotionally and spiritually scarred for the loss of his kids and his wife's cruelty. Though the drinking was the cause of the loss of his kids, he would not have started drinking if his ex wife wasn't such a bitch. The fact that both were hurt is what cause the situation to arise. They didn't want to put themselves in danger by going to a strange persons house. And he didn't want to put himself in danger by being alone. In any case. Even if they did have dinner with him and give him that shoulder to cry on, it is likely that he would have committed suicide anyway, due to that traumatic events that occurred earlier in his life. Im still not saying that it was John's fault. If any fault could be blamed i would say it was the ex wife. If her intent was to hurt him through a divorce and take his kids away from him, she may have had an idea that it would ruin him and bring him to do what he did. Ultimately, it is a result of an unfortunate chain of events. Had the wife not decided to try to ruin him, and instead went about the divorce in a more humane manner, John may still be alive today.
  

Q.Did you know that Islam is an ideology and not a religion?Related Search:
Politics
 Islam is not a religion. The purpose of Islam is political, economic and military. Islam seeks to supplant secular governments with world-wide Sharia law dominated by one Caliph. Most people in Islamic countries do not go to schools to learn about languages, history, mathetmatics, science, biology, (some do) but they go to madrassas to learn Islamic law. Islam believes that the Koran is the only book worth knowing and memorizing. This all started with a warlord, Muhammad. He sought economic, political and military power. He wanted to unite the disorganized pagan Arabs and did so by starting a "religion" as a way of stoking pride and order. He murdered, plundered, stole, raped and told his followers to do so as long as they did it to non-believers and not each other. He attacked a caravan between Mecca (his birthplace) and Medinah and took the loot for himself and his loyal soldiers. He was never in Jersualam but his followers sacked it after his death.
A.really? I should have missed the evening bulletin. Never got this on the news
  

Q.nan's death is tearing me apart?Related Search:
Mental Health
 In 2 days time will be the 10th anniversary of my nan's death and i don't know how to cope as i feel to blame for her death. We were very close and i loved her so very much,i would spend every weekend and school holiday with her ever since i was about 5 years old and when i was 16 i moved in with her to look after her as she had a hip replacement and i stayed there for 2 years,we were like best friends and she had a heart of gold,she was a lovely lady and i miss her dreadfully. I first noticed something was wrong when she said her hand hurt and she could not grip a knife,pen,etc so i called the doctor out and was told my nan had arthritis and she was given pain killers,these seemed to work so i stopped the worry but a couple of weeks later she was bad again but she never liked a fuss so i asked her to come and stay with me and my husband and our baby daughter untill she felt better and she agreed to this but after a day or so although she was fine in herself,she started saying that her hand and her arm really hurt but when i said i was phoning the doctor again she said that it was just the arthritis and not to trouble the doctor and i did not want to upset her so i agreed with her that i would not phone the doctor,after a few days my uncle (her son) said he was going away to stay in his seaside caravan for a long weekend and asked my nan to go with him as he thought some sea air would be good for her so she went they returned she felt very ill and wanted to go straight home so i stayed with her for a few hours but i had to go home to look after my baby as my husband had to go back to work,i asked my nan to come with me so i could look after her but she was adament that she would be fine and all she wanted was to sleep in her own bed,so i made her a hot drink and kissed her goodbye and went home,my nan never had a phone so i worried about her all night and the next morning my mum phoned me to say that the police were at my nans bungalow and had smashed a window to gain entry,one of the neighbours had heard my nan shouting for help and phoned the police and ambulance,when they found her she was laying on her hall floor unable to move,she was rushed to hospital where tests showed that she had not got arthritis at all and in fact she had been having mini strokes and the night she fell was because she had got out of bed to use the toilet and had suffered a big stroke,she was kept in hospital about a month and although still very weak she was allowed home and again i moved in to look after her but just after a week she was clearly not well at all and the family decided to take her back to hospital where we were told that she had suffered a massive stroke and was very poorly,she never left the hospital again,she was in there a year but during that time she was having lots of mini strokes and slowly her body shut down-she forgot who we were,she bacame Incontinent ,then she lost most movement of her lower body and she started hullacinating and had to be tube fed,this was very upsetting to watch and we were told that she would never recover and i remember screaming at the doctors to put her on a life support machine but they said it would do no good but even to this day i still think that it might have worked,we all knew then that she was going to die but none of us expected it to take a year and i wish it had not taken that long as by this time she could not even talk and was only awake about an hour a day and she never knew who we were or that we were there,it was so horrible to see her die that way but about a week before she died,i was just leaving the hospital with my mum and i bent down to kiss her goodbye like i always did but this time as i bent down,she raised her arm and touched my face and then she slapped me on the face-not a hard slap but it was the first time she had moved in nearly a year and even to this day i believe she slapped me because i did not get her to a hospital sooner and that she blames me for her death but my mum thinks she slapped me as her way of thanking me for all the help i gave her and to tell me that i have to let her go and that it would be ok but i just can not help thinking i left it to late to get help and she died because of me and this thought will never leave me,i spoke to doctors after she died but they said even if i had of got her to the hospital sooner it would have made no difference but i still feel to blame and now 10 years on im now 29 and i miss her so much and i now have 3 children and im 6 months pregnant again and i know she would have been thrilled but i can not stop blaming myself and i can not get over her death,i did seek bereavement counselling about 5 years ago but it done little good.i know ive written a lot and im sorry to have gone on but can you please tell me honestly if you think by what i have told you that i am to blame as no one has ever blamed me but im sure everyone thinks im to blame. many thanks
A.everyone lost someone close to them in their life-i lost 4 so far this year. i just remember the good times, look at pictures, etc-it's ok to cry
  
 Dictionary Opens New Window.

Click on the word below to see the definition:
 
 Encyclopedia Opens New Window.

For the 1920 film featuring Béla Lugosi, see Caravan of Death (film).
Generals Sergio Arellano Stark and Augusto Pinochet a few hours before the departure of the Caravan of Death (September 1973)

The Caravan of Death (Spanish: Caravana de la Muerte) was a Chilean Army death squad that, following the Chilean coup of 1973, flew by helicopter from south to north of Chile between September 30 and October 22, 1973. During this foray, members of the squad ordered or personally carried out the execution of at least 75 individuals held in Army custody in these garrisons. [1] According to the NGO Memoria y Justicia, the squad killed 26 in the South and 71 in the North, making a total of 97 victims [2]. Augusto Pinochet was indicted in December 2002 in this case, but he died four years later without having been judged. His trial, however, is ongoing since his death, and other militaries and a former military chaplain have been indicted in this case.

Contents

[edit] The death squad

The squad was made up of several Army officers and two infantrymen. They were led by Army Brigadier General Sergio Arellano, appointed by Augusto Pinochet "Official Delegate of the Commander-in-Chief of the Army and President of the Government Junta." Other members included Arellano's second-in-command, Lieutenant Colonel Sergio Arredondo González, later director of the Infantry School of the Army; Major Pedro Espinoza Bravo, an Army Intelligence officer and later operations chief of the DINA secret police; Captain Marcelo Moren Brito, later commander of Villa Grimaldi, the torture camp; Lieutenant Armando Fernández Larios, later a DINA operative and involved in the assassination of Orlando Letelier (Salvador Allende's former Minister) and others [2].

The group traveled from prison to prison in a Puma helicopter, inspecting military garrisons and then ordering — or carrying out themselves — the execution of the detainees, the murders being committed with small arms and bladed weapons. The victims were then buried in unmarked graves.

Though the Rettig Commission puts the count of murdered individuals at approximately 3,000 during the 17-year Pinochet dictatorship, the deaths of these 75 individuals and the Caravan of Death episode itself are highly traumatic, especially as many of the victims had voluntarily turned themselves in to the military authorities, were all in secured military custody and posed no immediate threat because they had no history of violence, nor were they threatening to commit any such violence.

According to Oleguer Benaventes Bustos, the second in command at the Talca Regiment when General Arellano landed there on September 30, 1973, the squad's aims where to instill "terror" on potential opponents as well as to insure the loyalty to the new junta of the military staff outside the capital:

It seems to me that one of the reasons for the mission was to set a drastic precedent in order to terrorize the presumed willingness of the Chilean people to fight back. But without a doubt, it was also intended to instill fear and terror among the commanders. To prevent any military personnel, down to lowest ranking officers, from taking a false step: this could happen to you![3]

Beside the summary executions of tens of opponents, General Arellano punished several military officers for not being "harsh enough" on prisoners, including the constitutionalist officer Lieutenant colonel Efrain Jaña Giron in Talca and Army Major Fernando Reveco Valenzuela in Calama [2]. Giron, in charge of Mountain Regiment N 16, was dismissed on September 30, 1973 for "failure to fulfill military duties" and replaced by his second in command, Olagier Benavente Bustos. He then was imprisoned two years in Santiago [2]. Valenzuela, who presided the first Court Martial of Calama, was forced to resign on October 2, 1973, as he was considered too lenient. Transported to Santiago, he was also judged guilty of "failure to fulfill military duties," and subsequently tortured at the Air Force War Academy in Talca and imprisoned for 15 months [2].

On October 19, 1973, General Joaquin Lagos, commander of the Army 1st Division and zone chief in State of Siege, designed governor of the Province of Antofagasta after the coup, presented his resignation to Pinochet. The day before, the leader of the squad, Arellano, had arrived in his district, and executed 56 persons behind Lagos' back. In some cases, prisoners were sliced with machetes before being gunned. When General Lagos learnt of these murders, he requested a meeting with Pinochet and offered him his resignation. Years later, he explained that he did not return the corpses to the victims' families for burial because he was too "ashamed" of the barbarous slaughter of the men [2]. According to the NGO Memoria y Justicia, "it is believed that Lagos’ denunciation brought a halt to the spiral of murders.[2]"

[edit] Indictment of Pinochet and others

In June 1999, the magistrate Juan Guzmán Tapia, who had indicted Augusto Pinochet at his return from London, ordered the arrest of five retired military officers for their part in the Caravan of Death [4]. Pinochet himself had been indicted by the Spanish magistrate Baltasar Garzón in 1998 after complaints presented by Victoria Saavedra es:Victoria Saavedra and the Mujeres de Calama (Calama's Women), which included the Caravan of Death case investigated by Guzmán Tapia.

On 23 May, 2000, the Court of Appeal of Santiago lifted his parliamentary immunity concerning this case, and he was indicted by Guzmán Tapia, on 1 December, 2000, as co-author of the crimes of aggravated abduction and first degree murder committed by the Caravan of Death against 75 persons. However, as soon as 11 December, 2000, the procedure was suspended by the Court of Appeal of Santiago for medical motives. In January 2001, the physicians stated that Pinochet was suffering from a "light dementia". On 8 March, 2000, the Court of Appeal confirmed Pinochet's indictment in the Caravan of Death case, but only as an "accomplice" and not as its main responsible. However, the judiciary procedures were again suspended on 9 July, 2001 because of alleged health reasons, and finally the Supreme Court invoked in 2002 a "moderate dementia" of Pinochet which enabled him not to be judged in this case [2].

In March 2006, judge Víctor Montiglio ordered the arrest of thirteen former army officers for their participation in the killings on murder charges [5]

In July 2006, the Supreme Court upheld a January 2006 judgment by the Court of Appeal of Santiago, which argued that the 2002 Supreme Court's ruling stating that Pinochet could not be prosecuted in the Caravan of Death case did not apply itself to two of its victims, former bodyguards of Allende [6]. [7]. On 28 November, 2006, Víctor Montiglio, charged of this case, ordered Pinochet's house arrest [8] Pinochet finally died on December 10, 2006 without having been judged in this case nor any other.

In August 2007, a Catholic priest, Luis Jorquera, then chaplain at a military detention center set up in Chile's north after September 11, 1973, was charged with involvement in the Caravan of Death [1]. Witnesses alleged that he had been involved in the exhuming of the victims two years later, the corpses being then thrown out in the sea from a plane [1]. Jorquera, who is the first priest to be charged with crimes committed during Pinochet's dictatorship, denied these accusations [1]. Beside him, the Court of Appeals in Antofagasta charged eleven other persons of involvement in the Caravan of Death, including Army Gen Miguel Trincado and Army Maj Armando Fernandez Larios [1].

[edit] References

  1. ^ a b c d e Chile priest charged over deaths, BBC, 1st September 2007 (English)
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h Caravan of Death, Memoria y Justicia (English)
  3. ^ Caravan of Death, Memoria y Justicia (English), which cites Jorge Escalante Hidalgo, "La Misión era Matar: El Juicio a la Caravana Pinochet-Arellano,, LOM Ediciones, 2000.
  4. ^ Chile's most famous judge, BBC, 14 December 2004 (English)
  5. ^ Chile judge indicts 13 retired military officers for 1973 death squad tour, 22 March 2006 (English)
  6. ^ Chile high court allows Pinochet 'Caravan of Death' case to proceed, July 17, 2006 (English)
  7. ^ Chile court upholds Pinochet bail in one case, removes immunity in another, January 11, 2006 (English)
  8. ^ Procesan a Pinochet y ordenan su arresto por los secuestros y homicidios de la "Caravana de la Muerte", 20minutos, 28 November 2006.

[edit] Further reading

  • Jorge Escalante Hidalgo, "La Misión era Matar: El Juicio a la Caravana Pinochet-Arellano,, LOM Ediciones, 2000.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links



All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details.)
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Privacy policy - About Wikipedia - Disclaimers - Fundraising
 
 Images Opens New Window.
File Size: 34.5k
Dimensions: 498 x 600 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 38k
Dimensions: 450 x 600 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 44.099609375k
Dimensions: 844 x 652 pixels
File Format: png
File Size: 120.5k
Dimensions: 479 x 591 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 95.099609375k
Dimensions: 425 x 667 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 89k
Dimensions: 400 x 500 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 25.099609375k
Dimensions: 256 x 380 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 33.099609375k
Dimensions: 576 x 1024 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 30.2998046875k
Dimensions: 343 x 458 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 67.5k
Dimensions: 518 x 384 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 27.599609375k
Dimensions: 350 x 450 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 29.19921875k
Dimensions: 512 x 600 pixels
File Format: jpeg
 
 MORE IMAGES »  
Go to » Web - QA - Dictionary - Encyclopedia - Images