Go to » Web - QA - Dictionary - Encyclopedia - Images
 Web Opens New Window. Results 1 - 10 of about 15,100,000 for Air propulsion 

Air propulsion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  
Air propulsion. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Jump to: navigation, search ... Air propulsion is the act of moving an object through the air. ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_propulsion

Air-independent propulsion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  
Air-independent propulsion (AIP) is a term that encompasses technologies which ... However, Air Independent Propulsion is a term normally used in the context of ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air-independent_propulsion

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base - Propulsion

  
The Air Force Research Laboratory's Propulsion Directorate is the source to ... Air Vehicles (RB) • Propulsion (RZ) • Directed Energy (RD) • Materials ...
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/afrl/rz/

Compressed-Air Propulsion.

  
Douglas Self, Compressed-Air Motors,Mékarski,Bonnefond,Robert Hardie,Wantage Tramway ... The principle of compressed-air propulsion seems very simple. ...
http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/MUSEUM/TRANSPORT/comprair/comprair.htm

Aeromovel - A pneumatically propelled automated peoplemover (APM) system.

  
The Aeromovel Transportation System uses pressurized air for the movement of lightweight, high capacity vehicles on ... air pushes a propulsion plate ...
http://www.aeromovel.com/technology.htm

Patented Ionic Air Propulsion Jetpack

  
Alternative Energy ... electronic air propulsion - a clean technology that has none of ... Ionic Air Propulsion The basic principle behind ion propulsion is ...
http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/news8.5.html

Corona driven air propulsion for cooling of electronics

  
Electrostatic air propulsion. methods may improve airflow patterns in narrow. channels. ... The principle of ionic air propulsion with corona ...
http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/seal/pubfiles/Corona%20driven%20air%20propulsion%20for%20cooling%20of%20electronics.pdf

Thermodynamic Analysis of Compressed Air Vehicle Propulsion

  
Compressed Air Vehicle Propulsion. Ulf Bossel. European Fuel Cell Forum. Morgenacherstrasse 2F ... the use of compressed air for vehicle propulsion. 1. Introduction ...
http://www.efcf.com/reports/E14.pdf

Energy Citations Database (ECD) - - Document #5661919

  
The Energy Citations Database (ECD) provides access to historical and current research (1948 to the present) from the ... compressed air propulsion system for ...
http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=5661919

Car Boat (Air Propulsion Motor Boat)

  
Car Boat (Air Propulsion Motor Boat) - This set contains the essential materials used in construction of a simple electric circuit with a small electric motor, a ...
http://klk.com/navigation/detail.asp?MySessionID=238-191985997&id=KITCB
 MORE WEB RESULTS »  

 Questions 'n' Answers about 'Air propulsion' Opens New Window.

Q.Compressed air, rocket propulsion?Related Search:
Physics
 Does anyone know the exact downwards force the comes out of a compressed tank of air, to any size?
A.if you want an exact answer you need to give exact specifications
  

Q.Should I join the Navy Nuclear program or Air Force?Related Search:
Military
 I am trying to decide between these two branches in the enlisted military. I am 21 with a GED and 35 community college credits. I went and tested at MEPS and got a 99 on the asvab. Basically I find myself confronted with these two choices. Navy Nuclear Propulsion, or Air Force. Which would you choose?
A.The Navy Nuclear Propulsion Program is the best long-term choice since you will always be employed and well paid the rest of your life. For the short term, you will work hard, but you will get a better education than going to any undergraduate civilian program, and if you later decide to "go to college" you will find it to be quite easy relative to your Navy Nuclear challenge. The Department of Energy is proceeding with long-term plans for encouraging the construction of more and better commercial nuclear power plants, so as you exit the Navy Nuclear Program sometime over the next 20 or 30 years, you will be in increasing demand. This will be true even if more commercial nuclear plants are not built since "Navy Nukes" have the best possible training already and have a relatively easy time going through civilian nuclear power training, getting paid for being a student for their first year or so. Navy Nukes are actively sought by commercial nuclear utility companies and a number of consulting companies since they don't need much additional training or motivating. My brother went into the Air Force right out of high school, later getting a Computer Science Degree in college, having saved for college while enlisted in the Air Force. He later could not find any work in that area due to the fast moving changes in technology that made his education irrelevant by the time he graduated. After he had been out of work, unable to support his family, I spent a couple of weeks with him preparing him for an entrance exam at a commercial nuclear power plant. He got in and was paid to study for a year how to operate a reactor, all the time being paid and supporting his family. He had to work very hard, but he made it and went on to do other things at that power company. After I left the Navy Nuclear Program (I was an officer, not an enlisted), I already had advanced degrees from MIT as well as my Navy Nuclear experience. It was the Navy Nuclear experience that kept me employed and provided me with the knowledge that was most useful as a consultant to the commercial nuclear industry, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and to the Department of Energy. Once we had finished making all the commercial nuclear plants efficient and safe, I went on to work for the Department of Energy as a consultant, again getting in the door largely because of my extensive practical experience in the Navy Nuclear Propulsion Program. Even I now am in the market to hire a few Navy Nukes to work on nuclear weapons types of projects. Some enlisted and officer Navy Nukes do get a bad attitude due to all the hard, challenging work involved, not to mention the additional military obligations of family separation and long periods of time at sea in a submarine or on an aircraft carrier. I would like to point out that dropping out of the Nuke program is not usually a career problem, and it may even be easier to move ahead (get promoted) as a non-nuke enlisted or officer since the standards are noticeably lower and you already got at least some nuclear training, which is applicable in the non-nuke areas, including the self discipline needed to get ahead. I preferred the carriers myself, even though that is more challenging than submarines in many ways due to the larger and more complex power plants. It was always a constant learning process, with very high expectations in effort and performance standards. Yet, with a positive attitude and by displaying a bit of initiative along the way, it is likely that you can rise to the top in that and any other arena in the military or in the civilian world. The US Navy Nuclear Propulsion Program is second to none other in the world, the details are highly classified such that the technology is closely protected, and I always said you could give the Chinese or Russians all the plans for one of our aircraft carriers and they still would not be able to make it work. It is the people and the dedication that make it the best, so you would do yourself a big favor in just giving it your best shot and hang in there. You can always fall back on "Plan B," but don't start with that!
  

Q.Can Someone In The Air Force Tell Me If Aerospace Propulsion Apprentice Is A Good Job ??Related Search:
Military
 I Just Want Some Insight On It Cause Its Sounds Really Interesting , Preferably People In The Air Force
A.You will become an engine mechanic on the worlds most advanced fighter and cargo aircraft. The opportunity to earn you Airframe and Powerplant Lic. (req'd to work on any civilian aircraft) plus you'll have valuable job experience. Every job in the AF is a great job. We don't have ships or infantry and we have the best lifestyle. You will most likely work an 8 hour shift. Could be one of three shifts: Days (7-4), Swings (3-11), or Mids (11-7). Plenty of time off duty to attend college classes from 4:30 til 10:15 (roughly). Again...It's an excellent job and great experience.
  

Q.How large of a hot-air-balloon(s)/blimp would be needed to lift the Queen Mary?Related Search:
Aircraft
 ... or other such enormous ship? I need to calculate a realistic way in which ships that size can float in the sky ceaselessly. It's for a novel concept. If another form of propulsion (aside from lighter-than-air lift) seems more plausible, please tell me (for instance, could mass amounts of propellers work?). Cruiser: Hardy fuckin' har.
A.I'm sorry, I looked up the specs on the Hindenburg. Then I tried to extrapolate the data to cover the weight of the Queen Mary. The numbers got so big it became ridiculous. Miles in diameter, many tens of miles long with the kind of horsepower the shuttle generates. Picking up an ocean liner with a blimp is way outside any form of practical fiction. Honestly, I can't even dream that large. Good luck on your book, but if I was you, I would try for some other plot line. How about a top secret piece of alien technology that the government has and uses to save the day.
  

Q.Air Force jobs: Avionics VS Jet Propulsion?Related Search:
Military
 Anyone have any experience in these jobs? Should I choose Avionics 2A6X6 or Jet Propulsion 2A6X1? Are both flight line jobs?
A.Both are flight line jobs though jet propulsion does have a "back shop" where they fix engines that can't be fixed on the line or need heavy maintenance. Avionics - Deal with equipment that helps in the guidance and control of the aircraft. You'll do a fair bit of trouble shooting but most of the time its reseating a canon-plug or replacing a box. Jet propulsion- Work on the engines, lots of trouble shooting (got to make sure you replace the right part), do engine changes if necessary, scheduled maintenance and you may eventually be engine run qualified so you'll sit in the pilots seat and start up the plane. If you work in back shop you'll tear engines down and build them back up. (Back shop you'll be more than likely out of the elements) Even though both avionics & engines are flight line jobs, engines spends the most time out in the weather but I do think its the most rewarding. Avionics guys usually ended up helping out other specialties by holding a flashlight or getting tools from the box. Spent 4 years on the flight line as a C130 crew chief, worked with every type of maintainer.
  

Q.What is the most efficient machine for converting air pressure into kinetic energy?Related Search:
Engineering
 I recently read about the CAT air powered piston motor and some nitrogen powered turbine motors. There's also the idea of making a motor similar to air powered wrenches and rotary tools. I'm just wondering what is the most efficient way to take high pressured gases and turn them into propulsion in things cars, boats, etc.
A.Question is hypothetical. Research is on for machines running on compressed air. They have made cars running on compressed air. The problem is range. Can you design a super light tank that can hold enough compressed air to run a car for a hundred KM? There are practical difficulties in achieving this.
  
 Dictionary Opens New Window.

Click on the word below to see the definition:
 
 Encyclopedia Opens New Window.

Air propulsion is the act of moving an object through the air. The most common types are propeller, jet engine, turboprop, ramjet, rocket propulsion, and, experimentally, scramjet, pulse jet, and pulse detonation engine.

The word is derived from two Latin words: pro meaning before or forwards and pellere meaning to drive. Propulsion means to push forward or drive an object forward. A propulsion system is a machine that produces thrust to push an object forward. On airplanes, thrust is usually generated through some application of Newton's third law of action and reaction. A gas, or working fluid, is accelerated by the engine, and the reaction to this acceleration produces a force on the engine. A general derivation of the thrust equation shows that the amount of thrust generated depends on the mass flow through the engine and the exit velocity of the gas. Different propulsion systems generate thrust in slightly different ways. We will discuss four principal propulsion systems: the propeller, the turbine (or jet) engine, the ramjet, and the rocket.

Why are there different types of engines? If we think about Newton's first law of motion, we realize that an airplane propulsion system must serve two purposes. First, the thrust from the propulsion system must balance the drag of the airplane when the airplane is cruising. And second, the thrust from the propulsion system must exceed the drag of the airplane for the airplane to accelerate. In fact, the greater the difference between the thrust and the drag, called the excess thrust, the faster the airplane will accelerate.

Some aircraft, like airliners and cargo planes, spend most of their life in a cruise condition. For these airplanes, excess thrust is not as important as high engine efficiency and low fuel usage. Since thrust depends on both the amount of gas moved and the velocity, we can generate high thrust by accelerating a large mass of gas by a small amount, or by accelerating a small mass of gas by a large amount. Because of the aerodynamic efficiency of propellers and fans, it is more fuel efficient to accelerate a large mass by a small amount. That is why we find high bypass fans and turboprops on cargo planes and airliners.

Some aircraft, like fighter planes or experimental high speed aircraft, require very high excess thrust to accelerate quickly and to overcome the high drag associated with high speeds. For these airplanes, engine efficiency is not as important as very high thrust. Modern military aircraft typically employ afterburners on a low bypass turbofan core. Future hypersonic aircraft will employ some type of ramjet or rocket propulsion.



All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details.)
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
Privacy policy - About Wikipedia - Disclaimers - Fundraising
 
 Images Opens New Window.
File Size: 49.7998046875k
Dimensions: 323 x 400 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 2.2998046875k
Dimensions: 100 x 65 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 22.099609375k
Dimensions: 346 x 432 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 19.599609375k
Dimensions: 193 x 273 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 26.3994140625k
Dimensions: 281 x 417 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 37.19921875k
Dimensions: 234 x 350 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 74.19921875k
Dimensions: 561 x 400 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 35.599609375k
Dimensions: 476 x 500 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 37.2998046875k
Dimensions: 234 x 350 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 4.19921875k
Dimensions: 172 x 231 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 14k
Dimensions: 168 x 260 pixels
File Format: jpeg
File Size: 68.7998046875k
Dimensions: 486 x 648 pixels
File Format: jpeg
 
 MORE IMAGES »  
Go to » Web - QA - Dictionary - Encyclopedia - Images